Abstract Background: Sizeable proportion of patients have discordant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (NHDL-C). It has been shown that discordance of LDL-C and NHDL-C either underestimates or overestimates coronary risk. Objectıve: We assessed whether this discordance has an impact on GRACE and TIMI risk scores in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 198 consecutive patients with AMI. Fasting serum lipid profiles were recorded, GRACE and TIMI scores were calculated. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to LDL-C and NHDL-C percentiles: Discordant group: LDL-C<NHDL-C (n=38), concordant group: LDL-C=NHDL-C (n=112) and discordant group LDL-C>NHDL-C (n=48). GRACE and TIMI scores, mortality and cardiovascular events (heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction and angina) at sixth month were compared between these three groups. Differences between these groups were analyzed with One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis rank test, and with chi-square for percentages. Also, post hoc LSD or Conover-Iman's non-parametric multiple comparison test were used. A p value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: TIMI risk score didn't differ between discordant or concordant groups. Mean GRACE (death) and GRACE (death and MI) scores were higher in group with LDL-C<NHDL-C than with LDL-C=NHDL-C and LDL-C>NHDL-C (p=0.029 and 0.008, respectively). Cardiovascular events and mortality at sixth month were not different among groups (p=0.473 and p=0.176, respectively). Conclusion: GRACE score was higher in discordant group with LDL-C<NHDL-C, but there is no difference regarding TIMI scores between discordant and concordant groups in AMI patients.

Abstract Background Left ventricular apical thrombus (AT) is generally associated with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. The thrombo-inflammatory process plays an important role in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes and post-myocardial thromboembolic complications. Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been linked to poor prognosis following myocardial infarction. Recently, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has emerged as a new marker of worse outcomes linking inflammation and thrombosis. Objective We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the marker – mean platelet volume to lymphocyte ratio (MPVLR) in patients with AT. Methods Fifty-six patients with left ventricular AT after an anterior myocardial infarction and 51 patients without left ventricular AT after an anterior myocardial infarction were enrolled in this study retrospectively. Admission MPVLR was compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify whether MPVLR is an independent predictor of AT. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to show the optimal cut-off for MPVLR to predict AT. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Age, gender, frequency of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and atrial fibrillation, and ejection fraction values did not differ between the groups. MPVLR was higher in patients with AT than patients without AT (7.91±2.5 vs 5.1±2.1, p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed moderate diagnostic value in predicting the presence of AT with a MPVLR cut-off > 4.75 (82.1% sensivity and 70.2% specifity (area under the curve=0.811, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.731-0.891, p<0.001). MPVLR was found to be an independent risk factor for the formation of AT (B:0.441, p.0.001). Conclusion MPVLR is a simple, cheap and easily accessible test that can predict left ventricular AT formation. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Resumo Fundamento: Uma proporção considerável de pacientes apresenta níveis discordantes de colesterol de lipoproteína de baixa densidade (LDL) e de não alta densidade (não HDL). Objetivos: Avaliar a relação da discordância entre colesterol LDL e não HDL com a gravidade da doença arterial coronariana (DAC). Métodos: Avaliamos retrospectivamente os dados de 574 pacientes submetidos consecutivamente à angiografia coronariana. Foram registrados os perfis lipídicos séricos em jejum, e depois foram calculados os escores SYNTAX e Gensini para estabelecer a complexidade e a gravidade da DAC. Determinamos as medianas para colesterol LDL e não-HDL para examinar a discordância entre ambos. Discordância foi definida como LDL maior ou igual à mediana e não-HDL menor que mediana; ou LDL menor que a mediana e não-HDL maior ou igual à mediana. Valor de p < 0,05 foi aceito como estatisticamente significante. Resultados: Os níveis de colesterol LDL estiveram forte e positivamente correlacionados com os níveis de colesterol não-HDL (r = 0,865, p < 0,001), mas 15% dos pacientes apresentaram discordância entre LDL e não-HDL. A porcentagem de pacientes com escore Gensini ou SYNTAX zero não diferiu entre os grupos discordantes ou concordantes (p = 0,837, p = 0,821, respectivamente). Escores médios de Gensini e SYNTAX, porcentagem de pacientes com escore Gensini ≥ 20 e SYNTAX > 22 não foram diferentes de grupo para grupo (p = 0,635, p = 0,733, p = 0,799, p = 0,891, respectivamente). Além disso, não houve correlação estatisticamente significativa entre os escores de cholesterol LDL e Gensini ou SYNTAX em nenhum dos grupos discordantes ou concordantes. Também não foi encontrada correlação entre cholesterol não HDL e escore Gensini ou SYNTAX. Conclusões: Embora tenha havido discordância entre colesterol LDL e não-HDL (15% dos pacientes), não há diferença quanto à gravidade e complexidade da DAC entre os grupos discordantes e concordantes.

Abstract Background: A sizeable proportion of patients have discordant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). Objectives: We assessed the relationship between discordance of LDL-C and non-HDL-C and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 574 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography. Fasting serum lipid profiles were recorded, SYNTAX and Gensini scores were calculated to establish CAD complexity and severity. We determined the medians for LDL-C and non-HDL-C to examine the discordance between LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Discordance was defined as LDL-C greater than or equal to the median and non-HDL-C less than median; or LDL-C less than median and non-HDL-C greater than or equal to median. A p value < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: LDL-C levels were strongly and positively correlated with non-HDL-C levels (r = 0.865, p < 0.001) but 15% of patients had discordance between LDL-C and non-HDL-C. The percentage of patients with a Gensini score of zero or SYNTAX score of zero did not differ between discordant or concordant groups (p = 0.837, p = 0.821, respectively). Mean Gensini and SYNTAX scores, percentage of patients with Gensini score ≥20 and SYNTAX score >22 were not different from group to group (p = 0.635, p = 0.733, p = 0.799, p = 0.891, respectively). Also, there was no statistically significant correlation between LDL-C and Gensini or SYNTAX scores in any of the discordant or concordant groups. Additionally, no correlation was found between non-HDL-C and Gensini or SYNTAX score. Conclusions: While there was discordance between LDL-C and non-HDL-C (15% of patients), there is no difference regarding CAD severity and complexity between discordant and concordant groups.